Exploring knowledge, perspectives, and misperceptions of palliative care: A mixed methods analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To better understand palliative care knowledge and beliefs of patients with stage II or greater bladder cancer and their caregivers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Participants were primarily patients diagnosed with muscle-invasive or locally advanced bladder cancer. All were encouraged to enroll with a caregiver (defined as the individual who most closely assists with a patient's care). Participants completed a survey and semistructured interview. Applied thematic analysis techniques were used to analyze the interview data. In total, we recruited 16 dyads, 11 patients who participated alone, and 1 caregiver who participated alone. RESULTS: Patients and caregivers had high levels of palliative care knowledge and there was no difference in baseline knowledge. Palliative care receptivity was also high, with most participants stating that they would be "very likely" to consider palliative care for themselves or a loved one. However, based on the analysis of multiple-choice palliative care questions and interview transcripts, many participants lacked a nuanced understanding of palliative care and harbored many common misconceptions of the basic tenants. Five main themes emerged related to palliative care: (1) Participants have a general lack of awareness of it, (2) Participants associate it with hospice and death, (3) Participants view it as primarily emotional or psychological support, (4) Participants believe it is for patients without a strong support system, and (5) Participants believe it is for people who have "given up." CONCLUSIONS: High educational attainment and baseline palliative care knowledge did not preclude the most common misperceptions related to palliative care. These study results indicate that patients need clearer counseling regarding the definition, goals, benefits, and availability of palliative care.

Is There a Role for Palliative Services and Supportive Care in Managing Advanced Penile Cancer?

OBJECTIVES: We aim to review the benefits of palliative care, describe why a palliative approach to care is needed for patients with advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma and propose ways in which oncology nurses can improve access to and provision of palliative care. DATA SOURCES: A review of the literature was performed and identified a range of randomized trials and systematic reviews regarding the benefits of palliative care in this patient group. Cohort studies of patients with penile cancer were used to describe the psychosocial and physical disease burden of penile cancer. CONCLUSION: Throughout each phase of penile cancer and its treatment, oncology nurses can engage in care that goes beyond cancer-directed treatments to address the whole person, thereby improving quality of life by delivering person-centered palliative care in line with individual needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Oncology nurses are in key positions to explore many concerns that patients with penile cancer have for themselves or their caregivers. Through speaking directly with patients and caregivers, oncology nurses can uncover sources of distress, assess for unmet needs, and advocate for improved primary palliative care or early referral to specialty palliative care teams.

A simple test-based frailty index to predict survival among cancer patients with an unplanned hospitalization: An observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a state of increased vulnerability to stressors, and predicts risk of adverse outcomes, such as mortality. Frailty can be defined by a frailty index (FI) using an accumulation of deficits approach. An FI comprised of 20 items derived from our previously studied test-based frailty index (TBFI) and an additional 33 survey-based elements sourced from the standard CGA was developed to evaluate if predictive validity of survival was improved. METHODS: One hundred eighty-nine cancer patients during acute hospitalization were consented between September 2018 and May 2019. Frailty scores were calculated, and patients were categorized into four groups: non-frail (0-0.2), mildly frail (0.2-0.3), moderately frail (0.3-0.4), and severely frail (>0.4). Patients were followed for 1-year to assess FI and TBFI prediction of survival. Area under the curve (AUC) statistics from ROC analyses were compared for the FI versus TBFI. RESULTS: Increasing frailty was similarly associated with increased risk of mortality (HR, 4.5 [95% CI, 2.519-8.075] and HR, 4.1 [95%CI, 1.692-9.942]) and the likelihood of death at 6 months was about 11-fold (odds ratio, 10.9 [95% CI, 3.97-33.24]) and 9.73-fold (95% CI, 2.85-38.50) higher for severely frail patients compared to non-frail patients for FI and TBFI, respectively. This association was independent of age and type of cancer. The FI and TBFI were predictive of survival for older and younger cancer patients with no significant differences between models in discriminating survival (FI AUC, 0.747 [95% CI, 0.6772-0.8157] and TBFI AUC, 0.724 [95% CI, 0.6513-0.7957]). CONCLUSIONS: The TBFI was predictive of survival, and the addition of an in-person assessment (FI) did not greatly improve predictive validity. Increasing frailty, as measured by a TBFI, resulted in a meaningfully increased risk of mortality and may be well-suited for screening of hospitalized cancer patients.

Virtual Teaming: Leveraging Team Science Sense-Making During COVID-19.

Individuals with cancer anorexia cachexia syndrome (CACS) experience multifaceted distress. To address CACS patient concerns regarding their experience of care, our cancer center established a specialized CACS clinic in 2016. We applied the team science principle of the team mental model (TMM) to support development of an effective interprofessional collaborative CACS care team. In 2020, cessation of CACS clinic in-person visits during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) threatened the viability of the entrenched TMM and once again jeopardized the patient experience of care. We present a case-based vignette as a representative composite of patient experiences to illustrate the challenges. A 48-year-old female was referred to our CACS clinic for pancreatic cancer-associated appetite and weight loss during COVID-19. To reduce risk of infection, in-person clinic visits were curtailed. When informed about the resulting need to defer the CACS assessment, the patient and her spouse expressed concern that postponement would adversely affect her ability to undergo anticancer treatments or achieve beneficial outcomes. To minimize delays in CACS treatment and optimize the patient experience of care, we applied the team science principle of sense-making to help the team rapidly reformulate the TMM to provide interprofessional collaborative CACS care via telemedicine. The sense-making initiative highlights opportunities to examine sense-making within health care teams more broadly during and after the pandemic. The application of sense-making within interprofessional cancer care teams has not been described previously.

COVID-19 pandemic causing medical and public health ethical dilemmas: A case report and review of literature.

The COVID-19 pandemic presented myriad of unprecedented and daunting ethical dilemmas to healthcare workers, patients, their families, and the public health. Here we present a case of a 42-years-old Hispanic female with underlying hematological malignancy that developed severe SARS-COV-2 infection amidst the pandemic. This case illustrates some remarkable ethical dilemmas during pandemic times, including the lack of advanced directive planning, the repercussions of restricting family visits, and what ethics in crisis and moral injury entails. Identifying the ethical challenges emerging from the pandemic will assist physicians and other providers in making proper decisions and maintaining the best standard of care.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on community antibiotic prescribing in Scotland.

BACKGROUND: Following concerns about increased antibiotic use during the COVID-19 pandemic, trends in community antibiotic prescriptions in Scotland were evaluated. METHODS: The primary care prescription electronic messaging system used in GP practices with NHS contracts provided near real-time data analysis of national data. The main outcome measures were the weekly number of prescriptions for antibiotics generated by prescribers in GP practices in 2020 compared with 2019. RESULTS: At end of Week 12 2020 (22 March), after a sharp increase, the number of prescriptions commonly used for respiratory infections was 44% higher than the corresponding week in 2019. The number of prescriptions for respiratory antibiotics reduced through April and May 2020, with 34% fewer prescriptions issued by end of Week 22 (31 May) than in the corresponding week in 2019. Reductions were pronounced in all age groups but particularly apparent for prescriptions for children aged 0-4 years. These data were compared with weekly prescriptions for a selection of non-respiratory antibiotics and no difference was seen between 2020 and 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Trends in antibiotic prescription data show that after an initial surge, and following 'lockdown' in Scotland, the total number of prescriptions for antibiotics commonly used for respiratory infections fell. We believe this is the first published national evaluation of the impact of COVID-19 on community use of antibiotics. Further analysis of national data is planned to provide a greater understanding of the reasons behind these trends.

Predicting survival in cancer patients with and without 30-day readmission of an unplanned hospitalization using a deficit accumulation approach.

BACKGROUND: For cancer patients with an unplanned hospitalization, estimating survival has been limited. We examined factors predicting survival and investigated the concept of using a deficit-accumulation survival index (DASI) in this population. METHODS: Data were abstracted from medical records of 145 patients who had an unplanned 30-day readmission between 01/01/16 and 09/30/16. Comparison data were obtained for patients who were admitted as close in time to the date of index admission of a study patient, but who did not experience a readmission within 30 days of their discharge date. Our survival analysis compared those readmitted within 30 days versus those who were not. Scores from 23 medical record elements used in our DASI system categorized patients into low-, moderate-, and high-score groups. RESULTS: Thirty-day readmission was strongly associated with the survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-3.92). Patients readmitted within 30 days of discharge from index admission had a median survival of 147 days (95% CI, 85-207) versus patients not readmitted who had not reached median survival by the end of the study (P < .0001). DASI was useful in predicting the survival; median survival time was 78 days (95% CI, 61-131) for the high score, 318 days (95% CI, 207-426) for the moderate score, and not reached as of 426 days (95% CI, 251 to undetermined) for the low-score DASI group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients readmitted within 30 days of an unplanned hospitalization are at higher risk of mortality than those not readmitted. A novel DASI developed from clinical documentation may help to predict survival in this population.

Integrating Palliative Care at the Point of Care: Development of Electronic Interdisciplinary Plans of Care for Oncology Inpatients.

Integration of palliative care (PC) in oncology requires changes in delivery and processes of care, such as implementation of comprehensive, evidence-based interdisciplinary plans of care (IPOCs). A multidisciplinary design team partnered with an electronic health record company and an information analytics company that specializes in online clinical practice guidelines. The team sought to develop electronic IPOCs that address the unique needs of oncology inpatients, attend to PC needs, and reflect the interdisciplinary team's contribution to quality patient outcomes. Our cancer center had paper-based care plans that were not well integrated into workflow, did not represent comprehensive PC, did not reflect interdisciplinary care, and did not guide evidence-based practice at point of care. The team designed IPOCs to be incorporated into each discipline's workflow and unique documentation and established clinical decision support tools to suggest appropriate IPOCs. Thirty-five IPOCs were developed and included all domains of quality PC. Evaluation of IPOC use indicated incomplete, but improving, adoption of PC-specific IPOCs with engagement in collaborative care planning by a variety of disciplines and across oncology nursing subspecialties.

Leveraging a Team Mental Model to Develop a Cancer Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome Team.

This article discusses the care of a 62-year-old man with non-small-cell lung cancer and associated cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS), and demonstrates common challenges faced by such patients and their family caregivers. The case description illustrates the fragmented approach of various disciplines to the patient's CACS care, resulting in undertreatment, delayed and burdensome visits, and patient and caregiver frustration and emotional distress. The mounting problems that arise for the patient over time exemplify the absence of a shared mental model among the various providers, patient, and caregiver for the care of CACS. Shared knowledge among providers regarding the tasks to be performed, the other clinicians' functions, and optimal processes for CACS care was limited. Each provider was responsive to individual symptoms, rather than conceptualizing the constellation of symptoms as a syndrome that warrants coordinated care among clinicians. This resulted in the patient and the family caregiver being at odds with their various providers instead of working in partnership with a shared understanding toward common goals. Team mental models have the potential to enhance development and implementation of care plans and improve patient care and satisfaction by helping clinical care teams establish team membership, identify shared tasks, and facilitate interactions. To help inform ongoing clinical practice and research, this article demonstrates how clinicians at one cancer center are leveraging a team mental model to form and support an interdisciplinary CACS team that provides coordinated patient-centered care.

Implementation of NCCN Palliative Care Guidelines by member institutions.

Increasingly, evidence suggests the integration of palliative care (PC) with standard oncologic care can yield substantial benefits. As part of an effort to improve the PC of cancer patients, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has developed clinical practice guidelines for PC that promote access to quality, evidence-based PC. This study sought to characterize current implementation of the guidelines by NCCN member institutions. Institutional representatives appointed to the NCCN Palliative Care Guidelines Panel were asked to complete an online survey in the spring of 2014. The survey focused on availability of PC services, screening and referral practices for PC, PC education, and quality improvement programs. The survey was completed by representatives from 21 of 25 NCCN member institutions (84 %). A majority routinely provides PC services via interdisciplinary teams; 52 % routinely inform patients of the availability, elements, and benefits of PC. The guidelines are most often used to guide clinical practice; only 10 % reported using the guidelines to formally screen for PC needs and/or make referrals to PC specialists. Among the 62 % of institutions that screen any patients using any available criteria, when a patient screens positive for PC needs, a referral to a PC specialist is made less than half the time. Implementation of PC Guidelines is incomplete and various aspects of the guidelines, such as the recommendation to screen all patients for PC needs, are applied inconsistently. Despite this, most institutions provide PC services in a manner consistent with the guidelines. Greater implementation of the guidelines' recommendations is needed.

Radiation via Intracavitary-Interstitial Pelvic Implants for Gynecological Cancers: Clinical Nurse Specialists Affecting Change.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: This article describes the value of a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) team in partnering with interdisciplinary stakeholders to improve care for women with gynecological cancers receiving radiation via intracavitary-interstitial pelvic implants (IPI). BACKGROUND: Intracavitary-interstitial pelvic implants can prolong survival but is associated with significant impacts on quality of life. Intracavitary-interstitial pelvic implants is a complex and invasive intervention that requires patients to be immobile for 3 days and creates challenges related to dignity, hygiene, nutrition, pain management, emotional health, skin care, and overall patient satisfaction. The nursing staff shared concerns with their respective CNSs regarding patients' quality of care. Lack of standardized practice/orders and gaps in knowledge created challenges. RATIONALE: Clinical nurse specialist practice requires collaborative efforts within the 3 spheres of influence to improve the care of patients receiving IPI therapy. DESCRIPTION: The CNSs recognized and addressed needs of patients/families, staff, and the organization across the continuum. The team's efforts relied on reflection of nurses' concerns, collaboration, and a unified vision for exceptional care. OUTCOMES: This CNS-led initiative was successful in establishing processes to ensure quality care. Improvement in patient care was achieved through creation of standardized order sets, a focused plan of care, and patient/family/staff education. Nurse satisfaction, confidence, and empowerment to provide patient care with dignity and sensitivity have been verbalized. CONCLUSION: The CNS team's broad scope of practice, across inpatient, outpatient, and evidence-based practice, is a strength. Key to the team's success was the recognition of challenges and a unified vision to bring together stakeholders to facilitate improvement of care. Future direction includes evaluating nutritional choices and examining psychosocial aspects of the patient's experience. An interdisciplinary nursing grand rounds is planned to highlight the outcomes of this team. IMPLICATIONS: The leadership of CNS teams with varied scopes is critical to affecting change within the spheres of influence and improving patient care across the continuum.

End-of-life experiential learning for newly licensed nurses.

Many newly licensed nurses begin their careers with limited knowledge and experience in end-of-life care. Findings from a literature review and a learning needs assessment of newly licensed nurses at a comprehensive cancer center guided the development of an 8-hour educational program on end-of-life care. An experiential learning approach was used to foster confidence and develop knowledge and skills in delivery of end-of-life care by newly licensed nurses.